Month: April 2010 (Page 2 of 3)

survival skills

One of JJ’s favorite games to play, next to “when we build a house…” is what I like to call the Revolution Game. He has a strong feeling that the modern world is going to go to pieces and we need to be prepared for such Revolution; inherent in that preparation is loading up the car and moving to remote space in Montana (because, apparently, Montana would never get bombed).

In an effort to prepare for such shenanagans, he’ll ask me off-the-cuff questions. What 5 things would I make sure I grabbed on the way out the door? Who will live on our compound? Should we live on a lake or in the woods? It all makes for very interesting car rides. And I have to admit that the thought crosses my mind when interacting with different people: I’d take them with me to Montana.

Last night, as I sleep very little now, I composed my revolution lineup based on the skills and qualities they offer. Clearly, because I have such little survival skill, my job would best be suited in a supervisory capacity. I’ve been told more than once that I excel at telling people what to do. I like to think of it as being “visionary”. But I have roles for those who we invite to the plantation.

1. Dan W. The man can do anything. Sure, his background is with Microsoft, but he says he is happiest when he gets to (and I quote) “kill sh*t.” He shall supply us with ample game and birds of prey, I’m sure. Not to mention his mean green thumb. He can grow a ‘mater the size of my head.

2. Dave N. He might be Dan’s long lost twin brother except that Dave can also build things, like houses. If I can keep Dave’s tongue out of my ear, we’ll call it a successful trade. But at least it’ll be interesting and I’ll have a permanent dwelling.

3. KLM, providing that she brings her Singer. Otherwise we’ll all be naked at some point. We can supply children for the sweatshop and eventually she can take on more of a teacher / supervisor role as well.

4. Matt E. Engineers are supposed to be smart, so in the hopes that we have to reinvent electricity, he’ll be good to have around. Now that Lost is on I clearly see that he will also have to have the ability to dismantle bombs.

5. Vacant spot: I need a doctor / medicine man / nurse. And not just the pill-popping, script-writing type. I need someone that can set JJ’s broken arm, sew together a gash wound, heal a fever and make sure we’re all clear of nasty skin diseases. I’m pretty sure our high cholesterol won’t be an issue, but there will likely be occasion for healing and I need some expertise. JJ raises a good point that this person also needs to be able to deliver children as we will have to do some major repopulating of the earth. I’m not sure this can fit that into the engineer’s job description.

6. Brent C. Since vehicles have been invented and that’s how we’ll be arriving, we’ll need someone to care for our fleet. If it has a motor, Brent can make it work. He also once read a book on farming, which adds to his marketable skills. Oh, and I like his wife a lot.

7. JJ nominates Chad L. for his ale-making skills. But this necessitates bringing a sibling and there’s not room in the procreation patterns for this.

8. If I could convince them to go: either Rob Bell, Don Miller, my friend Alan, or JJ’s friend Dave. We’re going to be spending a lot of time around the fire and I need stimulating conversation. One of these folk can supply us with a never-ceasing fount of thought-provoking questions.

9. Erin W. She’s also good for conversation and I hear she can throw an axe, so she has survival skill. Based on her tatoo, I think she also might know a lot about Native Americans, which just seems generally helpful in situations such as these.

JJ feels very strongly that number 10 is his mother. Reasoning: she knows how to can & preserve, garden, knows “a lot”, is mothering and is (I quote) “very nice.” These things are all true statements. I guess being nice can get you a spot on the island. I feel that her chicken noodle soup is reason enough to make sure she’s there.

Though JJ feels we still have some gaps, this seems like a pretty good list to me. I do wonder if we need someone in the animal husbandry department? And do I make room for Tom and/or Bob, whose real function would likely just be to question if everyone else is completing their tasks in the most efficient, cost-effective manner? They do know a bit about farming, but only growing things like soy beans, which, as previously discussed, aren’t even real food.

I guess I’m open to a few more nominations if there are others with a good knack at surviving “off the land” (as JJ puts it). But please remember that I’ll be living with these people, so personality counts for something.

**If you happen to be reading this and made the list, a carrier pigeon will be dispensing directions to this hidden mecca at 0500 after the revolution. Please keep your compass with you at all times. Take back roads because main highways will be clogged and / or unnavigable, much like 75N to BG on any given Tuesday.

the masters

For me, Tiger is just another reason to boycott Nike.

Yes, I’ve boycotted Nike, the former reason also being another big name; I switched to New Balance when LaBron signed a ticket worth more than the debt of a small African nation. Other than accepting a few gifts, I’ve kept to my non-Nike support and Tiger might just cause me to wave that banner high.

There’s been some public opinion asking if people are over Tiger’s indiscretion. I saw a facebook status that said, “no matter if Tiger is bad at life, he’s wicked at golf” and I’m sure this is probably true. But I’m not ready to forgive Tiger. I don’t trust him.

KLM said that her dad used to ask, through the process of grounding the kids, “are you sorry you did it? Or are you sorry you got caught?” Though Tiger has put out a timely apology to his fans, I believe he’s only sorry that he got caught, especially in such an embarrassing manner. So when he says he’s sorry, I don’t think that’s necessarily the case. He just wants his life back. And honestly, I don’t think he cares that I’m not over it – as long as he can go back to doing what he wants.

And, (this may be a bit more surprising), it’s not the infidelity that really gets me. Adultery realllly gets under my skin, but I think this version is especially worrisome. Though the real cause of death was adultery, the sickness leading to it was an overdose of power.

King David provides a parallel example. Both were caught with their pants down, but that’s not what should cause us to be apprehensive to trust again. Both were men at the top of his game. The world at his fingertips and no one to stop him. Whatever he wanted, he got – whether it be the conquest of a small nation or a green blazer. And so why should it be any different with people, specifically, beautiful women? These men thought that because they had money and authority that they can also take what was not theirs simply because they wanted it. Any person who believes this has fallen into a very dangerous place.

The adulterous nature of the sin makes me especially queasy not just because I feel awful for the wife. When a man feels so entitled to possess whatever he wants, and he puts women – people, God’s creation, individual lives – in that same category, it makes me a bit scared. We cannot be a society that allows a man collect ladies the way he does cars and it be brushed off so simply.

Fortunately, we’re not trusting Tiger to make decisions on behalf of our country; he just fills our TVs on a Sunday afternoon. But I do think it would be to our benefit if we take the position that the sort of person who thinks that a person makes a good object to conquer doesn’t belong on our list of idols.

For every action…

… there is an equal and opposite reaction. My physics teacher taught me this. Right? Or am I crazy and just making it up? Until my cousin KJ can clarify, I’m operating on this assumption. It’s foundational for a new theological conclusion**.

Tonight we rented Sherlock Holmes, and while Downey does portray an interesting Holmes, I must say I’m a bit disappointed with the underlying plotline. I think I remember seeing it on the latest Batman: that the good of the world cannot be good without an evil to fight against. Every Holmes needs a Blackwood; every Batman needs a Joker; every Increadible an Incrediboy; every Jack Bauer a slew of two-faced government moles.

But it’s not just true in the sense of heroes; there is something fundamental to the human condition that contrasts good and evil. It’s not until you’ve walked through the valley of the shadow of death that you can lie in green pastures. I think that’s what Jesus was getting at with the Beatitudes – each of the “blessed are the…” seems to highlight the people who know what it means to be without, at a low point – poor, mourning, weak. Until you see how little you have you don’t realize how much God offers. Those who live in the status quo are blinded to the many blessings of a life with God. Now that’s a bumper sticker: Mediocrity is blinding.

One of the classical philosophical questions of the world is “if God is good, then why did he allow evil to exist in the world?” Or… why all the hurting? Why introduce pain? Why create the mosquito? Lots of people smarter than I have attempted to answer the question. But I think physics, or Batman, can do it. Without experiencing the evil, one will never realize what is good. It’s not until you’re sick that you value how healthy you are. It’s not until you brake an ankle that you fully enjoy a good run. It’s not until you get a bad office chair that you realize how important posture is.

Our household is overcoming a bit of disappointment this evening. Not the trials & tribulation type, but disappointing nonetheless. But for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. I hope that this disappointment lights the way to greater joy when we see our prayers answered. We’ll give higher value to the good news when finally comes.

Now, stay tuned for the sister post on this topic: Every Batman has his Robin, every Holmes his Watson…

**This theological conclusion is not nearly as profound as that which I read by David Crowder & Hogan in their book Everybody wants to go to Heaven but nobody wants to Die in which they use the laws of physics – that energy cannot disappear but must go somewhere – to prove the existence of heaven. Very impressive.

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2024 Michele Minehart

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑