Category: choices (Page 6 of 8)

On Not Being There

My newsfeed erupted in photos capturing one of the most joyous occasions of my family’s shared history. I have to ignore Facebook altogether to avoid crumbling because it’s painful to be reminded over and over how I wasn’t there.

I didn’t smell the dust and beer and sweat of a day’s worth of celebration. I didn’t hear the jokes and laughter anticipating the big race. I didn’t pet Limelight Beach to give him a pep talk or a congratulatory hug. I didn’t see the horse take off out of the gate. I didn’t get a jab in the ribs when he never let up. No one hugged me in celebration and my cheeks didn’t burn from smiling in the hours following the winner’s circle picture.

Pile this atop the growing list of the ways in which I’m limited by my present reality. Living far from family with a gaggle of young children results in multiple occasions of sitting out the opportunities presented.

“It was just a horse race,” we can try to convince ourselves. (Yet all of the harness racing junkies will vomit in their mouth a little when I refer to the Jug as “just a race.”) Sporting event or not, the family experienced together. It will go in the books as something akin to Cruise 2000. My face will be absent in the pictures because I got the van fixed instead. Not by choice, but a result of circumstance.

Which is where it gets tricky. It was our choice, or so I hear, to have all these kids and move away and attempt to do this unassisted by kin. And while we mostly chose the size of our family and the way in which we spend our days, aware our life won’t share all similarities as others, we didn’t get any fine print to examine.

We anticipated having to rethink the way in which we vacation. We knew Christmas would be consistently small. It’s always been clear we would have to make hard decisions in regard to how we spend our time, specifically around extra-cirricular involvement by our kids. It was obvious money would always be in short supply. We weighed those decisions and found them worthy trades of the added personalities to our little homestead.

I love the little buggers, but nothing prepared me for the heartache of missing life’s moments like Thursday because we couldn’t find an all-day sitter. I wouldn’t trade our little big family for anything, but that doesn’t mean I can easily brush aside my frustrations. Joys outweigh hardships, but the challenges can still be heavy.

Similar to how it’s hard to say I’m pregnant, it’s difficult to share my feelings of frustration – I feel I don’t have a right to complain about the circumstances of life which I chose. Any parent is free to express feelings about challenges of kids, but the number of kids you have increases, so does the times you hear “well, you chose that” when you say these things out loud. As a result, I feel I must be silent about what keeps me up at night.

(Except for this blog, where I get to voice what ails me and put words to the feelings I didn’t fully realize until I start typing.)

Cheap, Fast or Good

Last year I had the privilege of working with a wise woman on a local project. At one point in the planning process she said what is likely a familiar adage to smart people: You can have cheap, fast or good. Pick two.

Photo courtesy of Juan Freire - CC License

Photo courtesy of Juan Freire – CC License

I tried to find a way around that one. It doesn’t exist! In my shopping life, in my organizational life, in my purchases – it seems I’m always making a decision between those three things. For food, we pick fast (local) and good. For clothes I tend to choose cheap and fast. For vacations, cheap and good. I would venture to say, take a look at which two you tend to choose and you have yourself a personal value system. (As a Wingfield, cheap seems to nearly always creep to the top of a list. It’s bred into me.)

In my mothering life, I’ve revamped the system. On a daily basis I’m choosing between Happy, Clean and Productive. I can manage to hit two of those, but never all three. I can have happy kids and get stuff done, but the house will be a disaster. I can keep it neat and tidy and I can attend to work tasks but my children are climbing the walls and screaming for attention.

On some days, I’m not even choosing two: if I get one of them, it’s still a success in my eyes. Especially if it’s Happy, because working to make sure all 4 of these little monsters lives fully into the day is sometimes all I can manage. (And that’s okay, too.) But I’m ridding myself of the belief I need to do all three. I’m not sure they can co-exist. Just like cheap, fast and good cannot co-exist (or it’s a small miracle), Happy, Clean and Productive rarely arrive at the door simultaneously.

If you look through your days, do you find a trend in your success rates? Perhaps you’re usually quite productive? Or the kids are mostly happy? Perhaps the challenge isn’t choosing the most important – they each have their place – but rather making sure we keep them all in the mix.

Bring along a God Box

[box] “… and Israel was badly beaten – about 4,000 soldiers left dead on the field. When the troops returned to camp, Israel’s elders said, “Why has God given us such a beating today by the Philistines? Let’s go to Shiloh and get the Chest of God’s Covenant. It will accompany us and save us from the grip of our enemies.” (1 Samuel 4:3) [/box]

After a particularly bad battle, the Israelites went home defeated and confused – why did God let them lose? Someone had the great idea, then, to make sure God would be on their side. They fetched the Chest of God’s Covenant (the “ark” for you traditional scripture-readers) and brought it with them to their war camp. When the chapel team arrived with the visible image of God’s presence in tow, the troops erupted in excitement. If God is for us, who can be against us, right?

The Philistines heard the ruckus and freaked out. They had heard about this God, the one that sent plagues upon Pharaoh and all of Egypt, the one that marched his people out of slavery. Someone probably gave a rousing speech in the locker room warning the soldiers to fight for their lives.

And they did. The Philistines obliterated the Israelites. The first battle left 4,000 dead on the field. The one where the God Box sat under a nearby tent saw 30,000 bodies at the end of the battle.

Why would God let his people be defeated? Don’t we read stories of victory in the Bible, especially when God is involved?

If we look later in these books, leaders like King David would often invoke the name of God into battle. Read on the books about the Kings and see David time and again asking, “God, if I go to battle, will you be with me?” and getting a response from God – yes. God’s presence will go before. This is the confidence preached in churches everywhere (because it’s true).

The Israelites never asked God. They never sought his wisdom, they never considered his will.

In 1 Samuel 4, the Israelites assume that they make God give them what they want. I suppose this is the difference between a living God and a box made of wood. You can march around with something that represents God’s presence, but that doesn’t guarantee God is in it.

How often do we mistake one for the other? We decide to go to battle and assume that if we bring the right scripture along or the dress up our intentions with the right theological words and ideas, then surely God will be for us.

We don’t get to drag God around like a puppy. We chase Him. We look to what He is doing in the world and we jump in. We’re God’s followers, not God’s leaders.

Discerning God’s will can be tricky stuff and passages like this add a layer of complexity. Yet they offer us safeguards from deciding that because we can put a Jesus Label on it, surely it is good and right. No, those passages that declare God will give us our desires and needs are prefaced with phrases like “seek ye first the Kingdom of God.” God guarantees he will not send us anywhere without His presence. Which is different from convincing God to come along to the next place you want to go.

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2024 Michele Minehart

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑