purpose

tonight at journey we talked about PSaul’s conversion (thanks, tyler, for that crafty way of getting around the “what name do i use?” issue). lots of great discussion, but it left me with a few parting, interwoven, thoughts. First, as 21st century Americans, we typically value Psaul for his contributions in building the church. a great contribution it is! he built what we now function from… i’m a psaul fan, so the following comments are in no way a slander to psaul’s glorious work for God. But God didn’t love Paul because of what Paul did for God. God loved Paul because God is love. God loved Paul for the man he was and for the man he was to become. In our task-driven, workaholic culture, i think we walk a dangerous line of valuing people because of what they can do for us. one of my professors often said we tend to make the people around us either scenery or machinery. we use them to make ourselves look better or to make us more functional. But God doesn’t do that. He doesn’t see his children only as a means to carrying out what is going on in his mind. He loves us for who we are before he loves us for what we can do. i work at a place that does outsource recruiting and hiring. basically, we find good people for jobs. God does not work at RTi. God does not look through our resume of activity and decide which of my experiences will be most beneficial for the position he has open for changing the world. he doesn’t see that i have a bit of church-work experience that would fit well for what he’s looking for. God doesn’t dig around and find something useful for him. as jim said, God was quite brilliant in having Paul as his man for forming the church. but i think it’s bigger than that. God didn’t see Paul as the perfect candidate. God created the perfect candidate in Paul. which brings me to another thought… God loved paul because God created him. and (*important nugget of personal information: i do not typically veer closely to the edge of pre-destination. I believe God gave us the power to love him by giving us the gift of free will and choice. so what i’m about to say has large implications knowing where i began…)when we consider the idea of “God’s plan for your life” and “God’s will” i think we often only think of our usefulness to God. where can i serve, what can i DO for God. we forget that God is creating us and renewing us to be his children. that his plan for us began long before we conceptualized His plan. if you were to ask Saul pre-damascus trip, i’m sure he would have told us that he was following God’s will for his life. but after an encounter with jesus, that understanding of God’s will changed. God’s will didn’t… Psaul’s understanding of it did. i’m sure there’s more to this, but this is a good ending spot. perhaps more another time?

2 Comments

  1. Trevor

    scenery or machinery. brilliant. convicting. bah!

  2. ryan

    I like the stuff you raise here. Something it makes me think of is the idea of abiding. Like, there is a lot of value in just hanging out with God because there is a mutual love-ish thing going on.

    I’d add this to the “time to…” list in Ecclesiastes. A time to bust your hump and a time to sit down and listen.

    I think we may not do the latter, because the ‘result’ of abiding with God and vice versa is often not tangible. No school for orphans built in Haiti or no one saying thanks for the soup or no one saying nice new song or great talk…

    …just the strength and vision to do all of those things…

    …so, not much really… 🙂

© 2024 Michele Minehart

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑